U.S. presidential election debates, 2004 Guide, Meaning , Facts, Information and Description
The '2004 United States Presidential Election Debates\' were sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) and concluded October 13th, nearly three weeks before election scheduled for Novemeber 2, 2004.They were the latest in a regular series of presidential debates first held during the 1960 presidential election and held every four years since the 1976 presidential election.
An alternative was proposed by the Citizens' Debate Commission; see the general article on debates for more information.
There are several third-party candidate debates which are independent of the CPD-sponsored debates.
Participant selection criteria
According to the CPD's website, the criteria for selecting candidates to participate in its 2004 presidential debates are based on evidence of eligibility (as defined in Article Two of the United States Constitution), evidence of ballot access, and evidence of electoral support based on national public opinion polls. Participants must be on enough state ballots to have at least a mathematical chance of securing an Electoral College majority in the 2004 presidential election. The key hurdle for third party candidates is that participants must have the support of at least 15% of the national electorate, based on the average of five "selected" national public opinion polling organizations.
The CPD applies these criteria in advance of each scheduled presidential debate. Invitations to the CPD's vice-presidential debate will be extended to the running mates of the candidates participating in the first presidential debate.
Application of selection criteria
Only President George W. Bush and Senator John F. Kerry met the CPD selection criteria for any of the presidential debates. As a result, only Vice President Dick Cheney and Senator John Edwards met the criteria for the vice presidential debate.
On October 1, 2004, the Arizona Libertarian Party filed suit against the CPD and Arizona State University regarding the staging of the third presidential debate, contesting that the debate, to be staged on the grounds of and be partially funded by a state university, constituted an illegal campaign donation to the two major candidates by excluding Badnarik. (Only Bush, Kerry, and Badnarik have obtained ballot access in the state of Arizona.) A legal hearing in this suit on October 12 did not result in any action regarding the staging of the debate, however, the Arizona Libertarian Party may still seek damages in the case.
During the second presidential debate at Washington University on October 8, 2004, Libertarian Party candidate Michael Badnarik and Green Party candidate David Cobb were arrested together outside the debate venue. Badnarik and Cobb were both protesting their exclusion from the debate and attempting to serve an Order to Show Cause against the CPD in the case mentioned above.
Three presidential debates were scheduled by the Commission on Presidential Debates:
The September 24 announcement, which was released in the format of a copy of a letter sent to the two campaigns, also noted CPD's pleasure at the willingness of the two campaigns to participate in the second, "town meeting"-style debate, yet was ambiguous about just what had been agreed to.
Originally, the CPD had announced that questions for the second debate would come from undecided voters selected by the Gallup Organization from the standard metropolitan statistical area surrounding the host city. This had been the policy followed for the 1992, 1996, and 2000 debates. But the September 24 letter to the two candidates did not comment on this; instead, it noted that campaign representatives can discuss participant selection methodology with Dr. Frank Newport of Gallup in order to resolve any open issues. One such issue was that the MOU specified that half the questions be asked by "soft Kerry supporters" and half by "soft Bush supporters", though what is meant by those terms was not made clear.
Jim Lehrer of The NewsHour on the Public Broadcasting Service posed eighteen total questions:
Kerry has also been the subject of misconduct rumors. Footage shows him removing something from his jacket, in violation of section 5(c) of the Memorandum of Understanding, which states, in part: "No props ... or other tangible things may be brought into the debate by any candidate." At first there was speculation that it might have been an index card or a piece of paper containing notes, but it was subsequently revealed that what Kerry removed from his jacket was in fact a pen.
Moderator Gwen Ifill of the Public Broadcasting Service posed a total of twenty questions to the candidates:
When asked about possible appointments to the United States Supreme Court, Bush replied he would not pick the type of judge who would support the Dred Scott decision. As that case dealt with slavery, abolished in the United States almost a century and a half ago, some commentators thought that Bush's reply was a rather strange bit of historical minutia. Others commented that the President's citiation was aimed at the pro-life (anti abortion) voters, for whom "Dred Scott" is code for Roe v. Wade, meaning that President Bush would appoint a Justices who were opposed to keeping abortion legal. [1] Further, the reference might have been meant to draw a parallel between the judicial activism of Judge Taney's Dred Scott decision to allow the morally abominable practice of slavery, and the pro-life position that Roe v. Wade was judicial activism allowing (in their opinion) the morally abominable practice of abortion.
Moderator Bob Schieffer of CBS News posed twenty total questions to the candidates:
This is an Article on U.S. presidential election debates, 2004. Page Contains Information, Facts Details or Explanation Guide About U.S. presidential election debates, 2004 Third-party protests and legal actions
Schedule
One vice-presidential debate was held:
Originally, the CPD specified that the first debate would be focused on domestic policy and the third focused on foreign policy. Those terms were changed in an announcement by the CPD on September 24, after it had reviewed the terms of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Bush campaign and Kerry campaign from September 20. The CPD agreed that foreign affairs and homeland security will be the primary topic for the first debate, and domestic and economic policy will be the primary topic of the third debate. More broadly, it also agreed to make a "good faith effort" to accommodate the rest of the terms of the 32-page MOU.Format
For 2004, each debate lasts ninety minutes, includes a live audience, is without opening statements, may include follow-up questions from the moderator and ends with two-minute-long closing statements.First presidential debate — September 30
Venue
The debate was held in the Convocation Center of the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida.Questions for President Bush
Questions for Senator Kerry
Transcript and video stream
Post-debate poll
62.5 million people tuned in to the debates, an increase of just over 35% from 2000. A Gallup poll conducted following the debate among 615 registered voters found that 53 percent felt Kerry had done better than Bush, while those who were of the opposite opinion amounted to 37 percent. 46 percent said they had a more favorable opinion of Kerry after the debate, compared to 21 percent for Bush. [1]Controversy
A bulge in the back of Bush's suit jacket during this debate has triggered rumors that he was "wired" with a radio receiver, presumably to receive instructions from his strategists. WP BBC News Bush stating "Let me finish!" in response to no apparent interruption and when he still had time on the clock also aroused suspicion. The Bush administration initially responded that the picture in question was doctored; however, when confronted with evidence taken from television broadcasts of the night, they claimed that it was a "wrinkle in the fabric." NYT The story continues to gain momentum after the 3rd debate, often referred to as the "bush bulge" or "bush wired" story.Vice-presidential debate — October 5
Venue
The only Vice Presidential debate between Dick Cheney and John Edwards was held at the Veale Center at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. The debate attracted a large audience, as 43.6 million people tuned in, nearly as many as had watched the presidential debates from 2000.Questions for Vice President Cheney
Questions for Senator Edwards
Transcript and video stream
Post-debate poll
According to telephone interviews conducted by Survey USA in Florida, 44% of people thought that Cheney had "clearly won" the debate, while 40% of people said the same of Edwards.[1] A separate poll found of 1000 likely voters found that 43% believed Cheney won while only 37% felt Edwards did better. Moreover, after the debate 47% said that Cheney was "very qualified" to assume the responsibilities of president (a 7% rise), while only 25% said the same of Edwards (no change). [1]Second presidential debate — October 8
Venue
The debate was held at Washington University in St. Louis, MO. Questions for Senator Kerry
Questions for President Bush
Transcript and video stream
Post-debate poll
A CNN/USA Today/Gallup snap poll taken immediately after the presidential debate found that 47% of respondants felt Kerry had won while 45% said the same of Bush.Analysis
Bush attempted to deflect criticism of what was described as his scowling demeanor during the first debate, joking at one point about one of Kerry's remarks, "That answer made me want to scowl" [1].Third presidential debate — October 13
Venue
The final debate was held in the Grady Gammage Memorial Auditorium at Arizona State University. The history of this venue is interesting in light of the current occupation of Iraq: architect Frank Lloyd Wright originally designed the building as an opera theater for Baghdad. In 1957, King Faisal of Iraq commissioned the aging Wright, then 90 years old, to design a new opera house for his capital city. Wright designed a building quite different from his prairie style, instead using domes, spires and ziggurats. He expanded the plan into a broader scheme for Baghdad, planning museums, parks, a university and bazaar. The 1958 revolution prevented Wright's plans from ever going into effect, and instead his opera house was built at Arizona State University. More InformationQuestions for Senator Kerry
Questions for President Bush
Transcript and video stream
Third-party candidate debates
External links
