Exact trigonometric constants Guide, Meaning , Facts, Information and Description
Exact constant expressions for trigonometric expressions are sometimes useful, mainly for simplifying solutions into radical forms which allow further simplification.All values of sine, cosine, and tangent of angles with 3° increments are derivable using identities: Half-angle, Double-angle, Addition/subtraction and values for 0°, 30°, 36° and 45°. Note that 1° = π/180 radians.
Values outside 0° ... 45° angle range are trivially extracted from circle axis reflection symmetry from these values.
As an example of the use of these constants, the volume of a dodecahedron is
The derivation of sin, cosine, and tangent constants into radial forms is based upon the constructability of right triangles.
Here are right triangles made from symmetry sections of regular polygons are used to calculate fundamental trigonometric ratios. Each right triangle represents 3 points in a regular polygon: A vertex, an edge center containing that vertex, and the polygon center. A N-agon can be divided into 2*N right triangle with angles of {180/N, 90-180/N, 90} degrees, where N = 3, 4, 5, ...
Constructibility of 3, 4, 5, and 15 sided polygons are the basis, and angle bisectors allow multiples of two to also be derived.
Simplifying nested radical expressions is nontrivial. The expressions here may not all be fully reduced.
Example:
This is an Article on Exact trigonometric constants. Page Contains Information, Facts Details or Explanation Guide About Exact trigonometric constants Table of constants
0° Fundamental
3° - 60-sided polygon
6° - 30-sided polygon
9° - 20-sided polygon
12° - 15-sided polygon
15° - 12-sided polygon
18° - 10-sided polygon
21° - Sum 9 + 12
22.5° - Octagon
24° - Sum 12° + 12°
27° - Sum 12° + 15°
30° - Hexagon
33° - Sum 15° + 18°
36° - Pentagon
39° - Sum 18°+ 21°
42° - Sum 21° + 21°
45° - Square
Notes
Uses for constants
Using
this can be be simplified to:Derivation triangles
Expressions not unique
It's not evident that this simplification is equivalent, and in general nested radials can not be reduced.See also
External links
