Étale cohomology Guide, Meaning , Facts, Information and Description
In mathematics, the étale cohomology theory of algebraic geometry is a refined construction of homological algebra, introduced in order to attack the Weil conjectures. This proved successful as a strategy, about a dozen years after the idea was mooted in the early 1960s.The formal definition of étale cohomology is as the derived functor of the functor of sections,
- F → Γ(F),
In these very abstract terms, the existence of such a theory comes down to some properties of étale morphisms in scheme theory, allowing us to use étale coverings as a Grothendieck topology; and some further proofs in homological terms, showing for example that injective resolutions are to be found in the sheaf category. To a very great extent, this attitude masks what is going on.
Some basic intuitions of the theory are these:
- The étale requirement is the condition that would allow one to apply the implicit function theorem if it were true in algebraic geometry (but it isn't - implicit algebraic functions are called algebroid in older literature).
- There are certain basic cases, of dimension 0 and 1, and for an abelian variety, where the answers with constant sheaves of coefficients can be predicted (via Galois cohomology and Tate modules).
- As it turned out, these base cases in effect determined the theory (perhaps unexpectedly); but the case of a general sheaf on a curve is already complex.
- Further contact with classical theory was found in the shape of the Grothendieck version of the Brauer group.
- The job of the general theory is certainly both to integrate all this information, and to prove general results such as Poincaré duality and the Lefschetz fixed point theorem in this context.
- With retrospect, much of the machinery of topos theory proved unnecessary for a minimal treatment of the étale theory (though applicable to the more subtle crystalline and flat cohomology).
- On the other hand étale cohomology quickly found other applications, for example in representation theory, going beyond the initially planned application.
l-adic cohomology groups
In applications to algebraic geometry over a finite field F, the main objective was to find a replacement for the singular cohomology groups, which are not available in the same way as for geometry of an algebraic variety over the complex number field. The hope, which was generally upheld, was that a replacement would be found in the shape of l-adic cohomology. Here l stands for any prime number with
- l ≠ p
- Hi(V,Z/lkZ)
- Hi(V,Zl)
The reason that one might guess that this leads to the correct definition, is that in the case that V is a non-singular algebraic curve and i = 1, it can be shown that H1 is a free Zl-module of rank 2g, dual to the Tate module of the Jacobian variety of V, where g is the genus of V. Since the first Betti number of a Riemann surface of genus g is 2g, that value is reassuring. This becomes a kind of 'base case' for inductive study of the general case (that is, i > 1 or V of dimension > 1). It also shows why the condition l ≠ p is required: when l = p the rank of the Tate module is at most g.
To remove any torsion subgroup from the l-adic groups (which can occur, and was applied by Mike Artin and David Mumford to geometric questions) the definition
- Hi(V,Ql)
This is how the theory could be applied to the local zeta-function of an algebraic curve.
Theorem. Let X be a curve of genus g defined over the finite field with p elements. Then for every
n greater or equal 1 one has
An application to curves
where are certain algebraic numbers
satisfying .
Notes
- This agrees with the projective line being a curve of genus 0 and having pn+1 points.
- We see that number of points on any curve is 'rather close' to that of the projective line.
According to the Lefschetz fixed point theorem, the number of fixed points of any morphism is equals to the sum
- .
The points of X that are defined over are those fixed by Fn where F is the Frobenius automorphism in characteristic p.
The étale cohomology Betti numbers of X in dimensions 0, 1, 2 are resp. 1, 2g, and 1.
According to all of these,
- .
The assertion on the absolute values of the αs requires some deeper argument.
The whole idea fits into the framework of motivess: formally [X] = [point]+[line]+[1-part], and [1-part] has something like points.
This is an Article on Étale cohomology. Page Contains Information, Facts Details or Explanation Guide About Étale cohomology
