Compulsory sterilization Guide, Meaning , Facts, Information and Description
Compulsory sterilization programs sprouted up in many countries at the beginning of the 20th century, usually as part of a program of "negative" eugenics -- to prevent "undesirable" members of the population from reproducing. They generally specified that an institution or legal body could order that an individual be operated upon, for the purpose of preventing further procreation, against their will (and sometimes without their knowledge).Usually such programs advocated sterilization by means of vasectomy in males and salpingectomy or tubal ligation in females, as they were not operations which significantly affected sexual drive or the personality of the individuals operated upon (unlike, for example, castration). This increased the seemingly innocuous nature of the operations, adding a veneer of scientific objectivity.
Plans for forced sterilization for the purposes of avoiding overpopulation are sometimes, but not usually, directly related to any eugenic intent. Please see population control for more information on this type of sterilization.
| Table of contents |
|
2 Germany 3 Other countries |
United States of America
The first significant country to undertake compulsory sterilization programs for the purpose of eugenics was the United States of America. The principle targets of the American program were the mentally retarded and the mentally ill. Some sterilizations also took place in prisons and other penal institutions, targeting criminality, but they were in the relative minority.
The first state to introduce compulsory sterilization legislation was Pennsylvania, in 1905, but it was vetoed by the governor. Indiana became the first state to enact sterilization legislation in 1907 followed closely by Washington and California in 1909. Sterilization rates across the country were relatively low until the 1927 Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell which legitimized the forced sterilization of patients at a Virginia home for the mentally retarded. The number of sterilizations performed per year accelerated until another Supreme Court case, Skinner v. Oklahoma, complicated the legal situation by ruling against punitive sterilization in 1942.
After World War II, public opinion towards eugenics and sterilization programs became more negative in the light of the connection with the genocidal policies of Nazi Germany, though sterilizations continued in a few states until the early 1960s. Some states continued to have sterilization laws on the books for much longer after that, though they were rarely if ever used. In the end, over 64,000 individuals were sterilized under state compulsory sterilization programs in the United States, with California leading the pack, itself responsible for over a third of all sterilization operations. Information about the California sterilization program was produced into book form and widely disseminated by eugenicists E.S. Gosney and Paul B. Popenoe, which was said by the government of Adolf Hitler to be of key importance in proving that large-scale compulsory sterilization programs were feasible.
In recent years, the governors of many states have made public apologies for their past programs. None have offered to compensate those sterilized, however, citing that few are likely still living (and by definition would have no affected offspring) and that inadequate records remain by which to verify them.
Germany
The most infamous sterilization program of the 20th century took place under the most infamous regime of the 20th century: the Third Reich. One of the first acts by Adolf Hitler after achieving total control over the German state was to pass the Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses ("The Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring") in July 1933. The law was signed in by Hitler himself, and over 200 eugenic courts were created specifically as a result of the law. Under the German law, any doctor in the Reich was required to report patients of theirs who were mentally retarded, mentally ill (including schizophrenia and manic depression), epileptic, blind, deaf, or physically deformed, and a steep monetary penalty was imposed for any patients who were not properly reported. Individuals suffering from alcoholism could also be sterilized, as for those diagnosed with Huntington's Chorea. The individual's case was then presented in front of a court of Nazi officials and public health officers who would review their medical records, take testimony from friends and colleagues, and eventually decide whether or not to order a sterilization operation performed on the individual, using force if necessary.
By the end of World War II, over 400,000 individuals were sterilized under the German law and its revisions, most within its first four years of being enacted. When the issue of compulsory sterilization was brought up at the Nuremberg trials after the war, many Nazis defended their actions on the matter by indicating that it was the United States itself from whom they had taken inspiration.
Other countries
Dozens of countries around the world, especially in Europe, also had similar sterilization programs, though very few had rates as high as the United States, much less Germany. In recent years it has come out that Sweden in particular had a strong sterilization program, sterilizing around 62,000 individuals over a period of 40 years. Other countries with notably active sterilization programs include Canada, Australia, Norway, Finland, Estonia, Switzerland, Iceland, and some countries in Latin America (including Panama and Puerto Rico).
This is an Article on Compulsory sterilization. Page Contains Information, Facts Details or Explanation Guide About Compulsory sterilization